Sent from Mail for Windows 10
ANU head has explaining to do
‘Rape culture’ facts just don’t fit
British school that won’t settle for second best
For this is a happy school. At lunch, 14-year-olds talked enthusiastically about reading Oliver Twist. “What I love here is the quiet,” said one. “At home there’s so much noise I have to go to the public library to do my homework, but here I can actually concentrate.”
Michaela acts as a surrogate family for children who don’t have those advantages. The children are not only given the intellectual tools to fulfil their potential. They are also loved, taught to love other people and shown how to love their country.
The British education system seems to be about engineering attitudes to conform to prevailing (left-wing) social orthodoxies. Michaela is bringing back education in the true sense of the word, where children love learning and learn they do.
Dr Carland says you can have Islamic Feminism
Dr Susan Carland believes that you can have Islamic feminism. In a western country like Australia, maybe!
Dr Carland, … said feminism existed within Islam and defended sharia law as a tool for fighting persecution of women in countries such as Pakistan, where women who are raped can be punished for “adultery”.
“You can have secular feminism, you can have Islamic feminism, you can have all different types of feminism,” she said.
And you can have Islamic Domestic Violence against women, male Islamic ownership of women, Islamic subjugation of women, Islamic second class women, fewer rights of women, lower inheritance by women, intercourse with pre-pubescent girls, fewer divorce rights, frowned upon leadership by women, deemed lacking faith and intelligence, and can be raped if held captive.
You can have all different types of female discrimination.
Dr Carland and her husband are the most dangerous public intellectuals in Australia. They present a beautiful picture of an Islamic couple and make smooth and deceitful arguments for Islam. Because of their high profile and platform to voice their apologia for Islam, too many progressives and young impressionable people will drink their kool-aid. And we all know where that ends. It will be a long slow death of Australian culture with a slow, migratory take-over of this country by a barbaric ideology that will destroy Australia as we know it if we let it. Western Europe is in the early stages of decline. The writing is on the wall.
Harsh words but don’t be a frog boiled in water. We all need to take a cold shower of rationality and get out of the pot.
Is Obama pro Shi’ite and pro Iranian
Arab TV Commentators Claim Obama Supports Iran Because His Father Was a Shiite.
Commentators on two different Arabic television programs claimed that President Barack Obama is pushing a nuclear deal with Iran because his father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Shiite Muslim, and President Obama apparently wants the Shia-run government of Iran to be victorious in the region.
This all makes sense now. Obama’s father was a Shi’ite Muslim and so Obama is either a Shi’ite Muslim or has Shi’ite Muslim sympathies. This is why he made the ridiculous Iranian deal for them to develop weapon’s grade material and gave them hundreds of millions of dollars and allows them access to supposed frozen funds. With these funds, Iran is the largest funder of terrorism on the planet.
Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran that will eventually let them become a nuclear power and it’s putting billions of dollars back into a country that’s the world’s largest supporter of terrorism. We are actually giving them the money to fund the terrorists that are killing us and our allies.
Shorten blocks Mother’s Day ban
Instead, principal Jeff Lyon revealed, the school would celebrate UN International Day of Families. “I believe celebrating International Day of Families is a more inclusive way of celebrating the richness, diversity and complexity of living and loving as a family in the modern world,” Mr Lyon wrote. “The day highlights the importance of all caregivers in families, be it parents, grandparents or siblings and the importance of parental education for the welfare of children.”
These words are obviously code for “I am pro Same Sex Marriage” and we should not highlight the shortcomings of SSM. Oh yes we should.
The problem with SSM is that two people of the same sex cannot conceive a child organically. For a SS couple to have a child then one of them will have had to go outside their relationship to conceive that child. This of course would break the marriage vows of “to the exclusion of all others.”
If a SS couple has done this and they are raising a child, then they have made a deliberate decision from the outset of that child’s life that the child will either be without a mother or father, and this is the problem that SS relationships create. Yet they don’t want to be confronted with this shortcoming. They don’t want their sins highlighted. They want their sins accepted and atoned for by state sanctioned same-sex marriage.
I don’t believe that children should be deliberately brought in to this world excluding from them their natural mother or father. While people are not perfect and children are often conceived and then one of the parents (usually the father) does a runner or is not committed to the other and goes their separate way, at least they did not deliberately set out to bring a child in to the world without one or other of their natural parents.
Great that Bill Shorten has stepped in and managed to reverse Principal Lyon’s decision. However, if that is what Principal Lyon believes then I think other beliefs of Mr Lyon need to be divulged and perhaps he needs standing down as unfit for being a principal of an Australian school.
We shouldn’t leave it at that though. We need to address the reason for the decision and that is a perverted ideology. Shorten won’t go that far though as he is a progressive and is in favour of SSM. But now Shorten has really exposed the fruit and consequences of his beliefs and ideology. He is without excuse.
Qantas CEO gets pie in face. Not on.
Qantas CEO Alan Joyce has had a pie shoved in his face at a business meeting in WA.
I am not sure of the person’s motives (an elderly gentleman apparently. Or perhaps not. Perhaps merely an elderly man!) for doing this. I too have disagreed with Alan Joyce’s use of Qantas to make political comments around Same Sex Marriage recently, but I don’t agree with shoving a cream pie in his face.
With all the violent demonstrations around the world lately, most of which seems to be by left-wing Social Justice Warriors (SJW), this action may seem very tame in comparison. Never-the-less, I don’t approve. I think a message of disapproval needs to be done without any physical contact or extreme embarrassment.
At the end of the day, the person will have done himself and his cause no favours. Most would immediately feel for Mr Joyce and take offence at such a personal stunt. Whatever his cause, he would not have won any converts today.
Let alone the fact that it is not appropriate to assault someone like this just because you disagree.
Toxic Bad Girls fb Group Under Fire
Inside the 200,000 member, female-only secret Australian Facebook group Bad Girls Advice
Aww, let ’em, I say. Girls just wanna have fun.
We cannot regulate people’s behaviour in private, despite what Gillian Triggs might want to do. If people want to do and say toxic things, then they are free to do so (unless they are planning terrorism or other violent crimes.)
If people say things in private, then they are owed privacy. If those things are said where it is believed they are private, then no public disclosure should have any negative impact on those people who said things in private. They are private conversations and others who were excluded from the conversation and have no rights to being privy to them.
It’s like police evidence collected illegally; it is inadmissible and for very good reasons. You have no rights to that evidence or conversation.
This applies whether it is a closed facebook girls group or US politicians.
If you are committing a crime though, well… that’s different. But the collection of material still needs to be collected IAW the law.
Youths? Anything else you can tell us about these youths?
Youths Arrested After Dramatic Police Chase
Officers arrested four teenagers at about 2am Thursday morning after a dramatic car chase — involving a police helicopter — which ended in Woodville.
Hours earlier, at about 11.55pm, the gang of youths allegedly broke into a home on Seaview Rd, Tennyson, and snatched up items including a handbag and mobile phones before being scared off by homeowner Jane.
A full story and images show shady characters running from police. What is conspicuously absent from this report is the fact that these ‘youths’ appear African. Of course, this is now a racial crime and we don’t want to unfairly label African youths as little criminals, however there is certainly a significant disproportionate number of crimes from this small section of society.
We should know if a particular people are significantly more likely to commit certain crimes, and not for just public safety reasons. It is so the truth can be known to policy makers so some form of corrective action can be taken. Political correctness and potential racism needs to take a back seat to our safety. We must deal with the problem that is at hand and not one that could be. Indeed, if certain Australians were to adopt a negative and racist attitude towards a group of people who are over-represented in certain crimes, that is a lesser evil than the crimes being committed.
Quite frankly, I think there is a real problem with accepting immigrants from problematic areas of the world as they always bring their problems with them. I would not like to see any further acceptance of refugees or immigrants from African hot spots as they are importing their problems to Australia. Our politicians have a right first to Australians to protect us from violence and danger before we import problems while trying to be humane.
If certain peoples need to refuge or protection, then there needs to be a better way of providing it than imposing dangerous social problems on others.
Right Wing Conservative 